Direct coronary arterial stenting without predilatation in patients with coronary heart disease

The study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficiency of direct stenting versus routine stenting with predilation. It included 133 patients. By the decision of operators, direct stenting was conducted in 66 patients (71 stenoses) (Group 1). The remaining 67 patients (73 stenoses) underwent routine stenting with predilation (Group 2). The initial angiographic success of stenting was 100% in Group 1 and 98 in Group 2. Complications were absent. In the direct stenting group, technical problems occurred during a session in 9 (12%) cases. In this group the mean duration of fluoroscopy and the total duration of a session were much less than in the routine stenting group. The mean number of balloons used at dilation per stenosis and the number of dilation sessions per stenosis were much lower in Group 1 than in Group 2. The results of quantitative angiogram analysis before and after a session were similar in both patient groups. Six months following stenting, angiographic restenosis occurred in 7 (10%) patients in Group 1 and in 9 (12%) in Group 2. Direct stenting is a safe and effective treatment for non-occlusive coronary lesions without marked kinks and calcinosis. Direct stenting reduces the duration of fluoroscopy and the total duration of an operation by 50 and 22%, respectively, as compared to predilation stenting.