The role of comparative morphology and anatomy in interpreting the systematics of fossil gymnosperms

This paper is an analysis of the systematics and phylogeny of gymnosperms as recently proposed by Meyen (Bot. Rev.50(1): 1–111. 1984). Attention is focused on the philosophical approach and on the fundamental concepts that frame the systematic scheme. Morphological interpretations are examined in relation to the concept of homology, and criteria employed for the recognition of whole plants from fossil evidence are evaluated. An examination of fossils from Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous strata reveals that only the ovules and ovulate fructifications constitute unequivocal evidence for gymnosperms in these strata. Such examination also reveals that they all can be interpreted as conforming to the same basic structure. If true, there is no evidence for more than one major group of gymnosperms in Devonian and Lower Carboniferous strata. Although many conclusions of Meyen are not accepted, his work plays a valuable role in focusing attention on important, unresolved questions of gymnosperm systematics, and provides a poignant stimulus for the proposal of alternative hypotheses.