首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


LUCAS - A New LCIA Method Used for a Canadian-Specific Context
Authors:Laurence Toffoletto  Cécile Bulle  Julie Godin  Catherine Reid  Louise Deschênes
Institution:(1) Cécile Bulle CIRAIG - Interuniversity Reference Center for the Life Cycle Assessment, Interpretation and Management of Products, Processes and Services école Polytechnique de Montréal P.O Box 6079 Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada, , ,;(2) Julie Godin CIRAIG - Interuniversity Reference Center for the Life Cycle Assessment, Interpretation and Management of Products, Processes and Services école Polytechnique de Montréal P.O Box 6079 Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada, , ,;(3) Catherine Reid CIRAIG - Interuniversity Reference Center for the Life Cycle Assessment, Interpretation and Management of Products, Processes and Services école Polytechnique de Montréal P.O Box 6079 Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada, , ,;(4) Louise Deschênes CIRAIG - Interuniversity Reference Center for the Life Cycle Assessment, Interpretation and Management of Products, Processes and Services école Polytechnique de Montréal P.O Box 6079 Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada, , ,
Abstract:Goal, Scope and Background Canadian LCA practitioners currently use European or American methodologies when conducting comprehensive impact assessments, despite the fact that these methods may not be appropriate for Canadian conditions. Due to the lack of suitable models that are currently available, work has been undertaken to develop an LCIA method by adapting existing LCIA models to the Canadian context. This new method allows the characterization of 10 impact categories. Methods This project is strongly based on preliminary outcomes from SETAC recommendations for the best available practices in LCIA. Models from 3 recent LCIA site-dependent methods, EDIP2003, IMPACT2002+ and TRACI, were used in this midpoint Canadian-specific method. Characterization models were chosen based on their level of comprehensiveness, scientific sophistication and the possibility of integrating site-specific values in the models. Results and Discussion All regional and local impact categories in the method are site-differentiated. For aquatic eutrophication, (eco)toxicity and land-use impact categories, regionally-differentiated models taking into account fate and effect were already available: the parameters of these models were modified for the Canadian context. For acidification, aquatic and terrestrial eutrophication, existing models were spatially differentiated for fate: regionalization of the effect factor was also included, based on the level of sensitivity of each ecozone assessed with vulnerability factors. The default spatial resolution selected for this method was Canadian ecozones, which define spaces in an ecologically meaningful way where organisms and their physical environment evolve as a system. For each ecozone, 2334 site-dependent characterization factors have been calculated. Conclusion This LCIA methodology proposes an attractive and useful set of site-dependent characterization factors for the 15 Canadian terrestrial ecozones. Recommendation and Outlook Efforts are being carried out to extend the specificity of some factors used in eutrophication modelization. Finally, the transparency of the methodology will allow to re-calculate site-dependent characterization factors for different regions and for additional substances.
Keywords:Canadian terrestrial ecozones  characterization factors  LCIA method  site-dependency  LUCAS  vulnerability factors
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号