Coevolution and maladaptation

Many of the most commonly cited examples of exquisite adaptationare of coevolved symbioses. As we learn more about the coevolutionaryprocess, however, it is becoming increasingly evident that coevolutionmay also keep populations moderately maladapted much of thetime. As a result, coevolving populations may only rarely occupyadaptive peaks, because the selective landscape is under continualchange through reciprocal selection on the species themselves.These shifting patterns of coadaptation are further shaped bythe geographic structure of most species. Selection mosaicsacross landscapes and coevolutionary hotspots can favor differentevolutionary trajectories in different populations. The combinedaction of gene flow, random genetic drift, and local extinctionof populations may then continually remold these local patterns,creating a geographic mosaic in the degrees of maladaptationfound within local interactions. Recent mathematical modelsof the geographic mosaic of coevolution suggest that complexmosaics of maladaptation are a likely consequence of spatiallystructured species interactions. These models indicate thatthe spatial structure of maladaptation may depend upon the typeof coevolutionary interaction, the underlying selection mosaic,and patterns of gene flow across landscapes. By maintaininglocal polymorphisms and driving the divergence of populations,coevolution may produce spatial patterns of maladaptation thatare a source of ongoing innovation and diversification in speciesinteractions.