Electrophysiological studies of forskolin-induced changes in ion transport in the human colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 cl.19A: Lack of evidence for a cAMP-activated basolateral K+ conductance

Summary Forskolin (i.e, cAMP)-modulation of ion transport pathways in filter-grown monolayers of the Cl^–-secreting subclone (19A) of the human colon carcinoma cell line HT29 was studied by combined Ussing chamber and microimpalement experiments.Changes in electrophysiological parameters provoked by serosal addition of 10^–5m forskolin included: (i) a sustained increase in the transepithelial potential difference (3.9±0.4 mV). (ii) a transient decrease in transepithelial resistance with 26±3 · cm² from a mean value of 138±13 · cm² before forskolin addition, (iii) a depolarization of the cell membrane potential by 24±1 mV from a resting value of –50±1 mV and (iv) a decrease in the fractional resistance of the apical membrane from 0.80±0.02 to 0.22±0.01. Both, the changes in cell potential and the fractional resistance, persisted for at least 10 min and were dependent on the presence of Cl^– in the medium. Subsequent addition of bumetanide (10^–4m), an inhibitor of Na/K/2Cl cotransport, reduced the transepithelial potential, induced a repolarization of the cell potential and provoked a small increase of the transepithelial resistance and fractional apical resistance. Serosal Ba²⁺ (1mm), a known inhibitor of basolateral K⁺ conductance, strongly reduced the electrical effects of forskolin. No evidence was found for a forskolin (cAMP)-induced modulation of basolateral K⁺ conductance.The results suggest that forskolin-induced Cl^– secretion in the HT-29 cl.19A colonic cell line results mainly from a cAMP-provoked increase in the Cl^– conductance of the apical membrane but does not affect K⁺ or Cl^– conductance pathways at the basolateral pole of the cell. The sustained potential changes indicate that the capacity of the basolateral transport mechanism for Cl^– and the basal Ba²⁺-sensitive K⁺ conductance are sufficiently large to maintain the Cl^– efflux across the apical membrane. Furthermore, evidence is presented for an anomalous inhibitory action of the putative Cl^– channel blockers NPPB and DPC on basolateral conductance rather than apical Cl^– conductance.