The evolution from females to hermaphrodites results in a sexual conflict over mating in androdioecious nematode worms and clam shrimp

The nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans and the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana are two well‐studied androdioecious species consisting mostly of self‐fertilizing hermaphrodites and few males. To understand how androdioecy can evolve, a simple two‐step mathematical model of the evolutionary pathway from a male–female species to a selfing‐hermaphrodite species is constructed. First, the frequency of mutant females capable of facultative self‐fertilization increases if the benefits of reproductive assurance exceed the cost. Second, hermaphrodites become obligate self‐fertilizers if the fitness of selfed offspring exceeds one‐half the fitness of outcrossed offspring. Genetic considerations specific to C. elegans and E. texana show that males may endure as descendants of the ancestral male–female species. These models combined with an extensive literature review suggest a sexual conflict over mating in these androdioecious species: selection favours hermaphrodites that self and males that outcross. The strength of selection on hermaphrodites and males differs, however. Males that fail to outcross suffer a genetic death. Hermaphrodites may never encounter a rare male, and those that do and outcross only bear less fecund offspring. This asymmetric sexual conflict results in an evolutionary stand‐off: rare, but persistent males occasionally fertilize common, but reluctant hermaphrodites. A consequence of this stand‐off may be an increase in the longevity of the androdioecious mating system.