Impact of Extraction Methods on the Detectable Protein Complement of Metaproteomic Analyses of Marine Sediments |
| |
Authors: | Lars Wöhlbrand Christoph Feenders Jessica Nachbaur Holger Freund Bert Engelen Heinz Wilkes Hans‐Jürgen Brumsack Ralf Rabus |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. General and Molecular Microbiology, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany;2. Mathematical Modelling, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany;3. Geoecology, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany;4. Paleomicrobiology, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany;5. Organic Geochemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany;6. Microbiogeochemistry, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Metaproteomic analysis targets proteins, the catalytic entities in the habitat, thereby providing direct insights into the metabolic activity of the community studied. A major challenge still remaining for metaproteomics is the effective and comprehensive extraction of proteins from environmental samples, due to their high complexity with respect to organismic diversity and abundance range. Moreover, in certain habitats, the inherent matrix may interfere with protein extraction. In recent years, several studies reported different protein extraction methods for soils known for their complex geochemistry, but only three analyzed marine sediments that generally comprise different though similarly complex geochemistry. In this study, the impact of four different extraction methods was investigated for coastal North Sea and deep sea Pacific Ocean sediments. The extraction methods comprised (i) phenol, (ii) SDS, (iii) a mixture of SDS and phenol, and (iv) urea and thiourea. Prior to extraction, a cell and protein standard (CPS) was added to the sediment samples to trace recovery of proteins from different subcellular locations as well as dissolved BSA. While each extraction method detected distinct peptide complements, SDS‐phenol extraction generally achieved highest protein yield and most comprehensive CPS protein identification. Application of two different methods was shown to further improve proteome coverage. |
| |
Keywords: | marine sediment metaproteomics microbial ecology protein extraction |
|
|