Spatial and Temporal Variability of Zooplankton in a Great Plains Reservoir |
| |
Authors: | Randall J. Bernot Walter K. Dodds Michael C. Quist Christopher S. Guy |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, U.S.A 2. 107 Galvin Life Science Center, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, U.S.A 3. U.S. Geological Survey – Biological Resources Division, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071-3166, U.S.A 4. U.S. Geological Survey – Biological Resources Division, Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717-3460, U.S.A
|
| |
Abstract: | Seasonal and daily patterns of zooplankton populations are often predictable in natural lakes. Distinct zonation and geomorphic differences in reservoirs, however, make ecological extrapolations from lakes to reservoirs uncertain. We describe the spatial and temporal distribution of zooplankton, algae, and water clarity across reservoir zones and along a depth gradient in Glen Elder Reservoir, Kansas. Daphnia species were most abundant in the lacustrine zone, with D. pulicaria numerically dominant in early spring and D. mendotae dominant later in 1999 and 2000. Rotifers (Keratella quadrata, Asplanchnaspp.) were dominant in the riverine zone in 1999, 2000, and 2001. Algal biomass was not significantly different between zones through most of the sampling periods, except late April in 1999 and mid-April in 2000. Chlorophyll a exceeded 81 μg l?1 in the lacustrine zone in mid- to late-April in 1999 and 2000, and exceeded 90μg l?1in the riverine zone in mid-April. Water clarity was significantly lower in the riverine zone in 1999 and 2000. Most zooplankton taxa had similar depth distributions at night and day, indicating a lack of diel vertical migration behavior on a large scale. However, in small scale (30 cm vertical enclosures) laboratory experiments, both D. pulicaria and D. mendotae occupied significantly deeper depths (>25 cm) under lighted conditions in the presence of fish chemical cues compared to shallow water (7–17 cm) under dark conditions and in the absence of fish cues. These contrasting results suggest that, as in other studies, Daphnia sense cues from predators and alter their depth in the water column on small scales without natural constraints on movement and choices. However, other factors in the reservoir such as wind-generated water movements and cues from other predators may prevent depth choices similar to those seen under controlled conditions. These results illustrate biotic and abiotic differences between riverine and lacustrine zones in a large reservoir, and contrast with Daphnia depth segregation and migration patterns in natural lakes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|