| Abstract: | In theory, selection favours predators that select prey in order to maximise reproductive success. We studied the association between preference and performance of the generalist predator Orius laevigatus with respect to two prey species: spider mites ( Tetranychus urticae ) and western flower thrips ( Frankliniella occidentalis ). Under ample prey supply, the predators had higher maximum reproductive success (measured as intrinsic population growth rate r ) on thrips than on spider mites; hence thrips represent a higher prey quality to the bugs. This was at odds with the observed preference of the predatory bug for plants (patches) with high densities of spider mites to plants with moderate densities of thrips in release-recapture experiments. Thus, prey quality does not suffice to explain the preference of predators for plants with prey. The quality of a patch as an oviposition site (i.e. the number of eggs produced on a patch per bug per day) also did not match preference patterns. Hence, patch preference was not correlated to prey quality or oviposition rate on prey patches. However, patch productivity, i.e. the total number of offspring surviving until adulthood that can be produced by one female on a patch, was correlated with preference. This was further tested by offering the predators a choice between plants with high densities of spider mites and plants with high densities of thrips in an independent set of release-recapture experiments. These two types of prey patches were found equivalent in terms of patch productivity. Indeed, the predators showed no preference for either of the two types of patches, which is in agreement with our predictions. This suggests that the predatory bugs select patches based on patch productivity rather than on prey quality or oviposition rate on a patch. |
