| Abstract: | Proficiencies in collecting stream macroinvertebrates by two types of artificial substrates, #200 3M conservation webbing and cone-shaped concrete blocks, were compared with bottom net collections. Conservation webbing collected more individuals than cone substrates, but fewer taxa than either cone substrates or bottom nets. Diversity indices calculated for collections made with the three techniques were lowest for webbing collections, highest for net collections and intermediate for cone collections. It was concluded that collections made with webbing substrates gave an extremely distorted view of macroinvertebrate community balance due to a preponderance of net spinning and case building forms, and that cone substrates were better suited for use in the particular situation studied.Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Center for Environmental Studies, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. |
