In vitro analysis of varus-valgus laxity of the knee joint: Comparison of clinical evaluation with measurements using a reference motion analysis system

IntroductionNumerous measurement devices can help clinicians during the knee examination. However, manual evaluation still remains routinely used to assess the knee laxities. The present study evaluated how accurate was a clinician for a varus-valgus stress test. We compared the clinician evaluation to the objective measurement of the knee movements during the same test session.MethodsWe studied six fresh-frozen anatomical lower limbs. The clinician performed a varus-valgus stress test in extension and at 25° flexion. The limbs were equipped with intracortical pins in femur and tibia, and spherical retro-reflecting markers were glued on the pins. Objective knees movements were measured by means of a Motion Analysis^® system (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). Two statistical analyses were performed. A single sample t-test was first used to verify the required 25? flexion. Then, a multivariate anova was performed to analyse the varus-valgus laxity under the fixed factors of measurement method and flexion of the knee.ResultsThe results for varus-valgus and total laxity of the clinician always exhibited a greater variability than objective measurements of the device. Test condition is a factor of grouping differences for Valgus and for global mediolateral laxity. Statistical analysis revealed that the objective measurement was able to show a difference between extension and 25° flexion for global mediolateral laxity, whereas the clinician was not.DiscussionThe clinician was relatively accurate in his manual evaluation. However, we demonstrated that a measurement device could clearly help clinician to exhibit differences in laxity. This can be very useful to compare a knee to itself in two successive conditions, e.g., before and after a surgery.