首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Mitochondrial Control Region and microsatellite analyses on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) unravel population differentiation in the Baltic Sea and adjacent waters
Authors:Annika Wiemann  Liselotte W Andersen  Per Berggren  Ursula Siebert  Harald Benke  Jonas Teilmann  Christina Lockyer  Iwona Pawliczka  Krzysztof Skóra  Anna Roos  Thomas Lyrholm  Kirsten B Paulus  Valerio Ketmaier  Ralph Tiedemann
Institution:1. Unit of Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
2. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, Danish National Environmental Research Institute, University of ?rhus, 8410, R?nde, Denmark
3. Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
4. Research and Technology Center Westcoast, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 25761, Büsum, Germany
5. Deutsches Meeresmuseum, 18439, Stralsund, Germany
6. Department of Arctic Environment, Danish National Environmental Research Institute, University of ?rhus, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
7. Age Dynamics, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
8. Hel Marine Station, University of Gdansk, 84-150, Hel, Poland
9. Swedish Museum of Natural History, 104 05, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract:The population status of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Baltic area has been a continuous matter of debate. Here we present the by far most comprehensive genetic population structure assessment to date for this region, both with regard to geographic coverage and sample size: 497 porpoise samples from North Sea, Skagerrak, Kattegat, Belt Sea, and Inner Baltic Sea were sequenced at the mitochondrial Control Region and 305 of these specimens were typed at 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci. Samples were stratified according to sample type (stranding vs. by-caught), sex, and season (breeding vs. non-breeding season). Our data provide ample evidence for a population split between the Skagerrak and the Belt Sea, with a transition zone in the Kattegat area. Among other measures, this was particularly visible in significant frequency shifts of the most abundant mitochondrial haplotypes. A particular haplotype almost absent in the North Sea was the most abundant in Belt Sea and Inner Baltic Sea. Microsatellites yielded a similar pattern (i.e., turnover in occurrence of clusters identified by STRUCTURE). Moreover, a highly significant association between microsatellite assignment and unlinked mitochondrial haplotypes further indicates a split between North Sea and Baltic porpoises. For the Inner Baltic Sea, we consistently recovered a small, but significant separation from the Belt Sea population. Despite recent arguments that separation should exceed a predefined threshold before populations shall be managed separately, we argue in favour of precautionary acknowledging the Inner Baltic porpoises as a separate management unit, which should receive particular attention, as it is threatened by various factors, in particular local fishery measures.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号