Short-day response in Djungarian hamsters of different circadian phenotypes

In Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) bred at the authors' institute, a certain number of animals show activity patterns incompatible with proper entrainment of their endogenous circadian pacemaker to the environmental light-dark (LD) cycle. Even though the activity-offset in these animals is stably coupled to "light-on," activity-onset is increasingly delayed, leading to a compression of the activity time (α). If α falls below a critical value, the circadian rhythm in these so called delayed activity-onset (DAO) hamsters starts to free-run and finally breaks down. Animals then show an arrhythmic activity pattern (AR hamsters). Previous studies revealed the mechanisms of photic entrainment have deteriorated (DAO) or the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) does not generate a rhythmic signal (AR). The aim of the present study was to investigate the consequences that these deteriorations have upon photoperiodic time measurement. Animals were bred and kept under standardized housing conditions with food and water ad libitum and a 14L/10D (long day, LD) regimen. Locomotor activity was recorded continuously using passive infrared motion detectors. Body mass, testes size, and fur coloration were measured weekly or biweekly to further quantify the photoperiodic reaction. In a first experiment, adult male wild-type (WT), DAO, and AR hamsters were transferred initially to a 16L/8D cycle. After 3-4 wks, the light period was shortened symmetrically by 8 h. After 14 wks, none of the DAO and AR hamsters, and only 1 of 8 WT hamsters showed short-day (SD) traits. Therefore, in a second experiment, hamsters were transferred to SD conditions (8L/16D cycle) for 8 wks directly from standard LD conditions. In 6 of 7 WT hamsters, activity time expanded, body mass and testes size decreased, and fur coloration changed from summer to winter pelage. In contrast, none of the DAO and AR hamsters displayed an SD response. In a third experiment, DAO and AR hamsters were kept in constant darkness (DD) for 8 and 14 wks. After 8 wks, DAO hamsters showed a similar photoperiodic reaction to WT hamsters that had been kept for 8 wks under SD conditions. However, the level of adaptation was still less compared to WT hamsters, but this difference was not apparent after 14 wks. In contrast, AR animals did not display any photoperiodic reaction, even after 14 wks in DD. Type VI phase response curves (PRCs) were constructed to better understand the mechanism behind the SD response. In WT hamsters, the photosensitive phase, where light pulses induce phase shifts, was lengthened in SD condition. In DAO hamsters, in contrast, the PRCs were similar under LD and SD conditions with a compressed photosensitive phase corresponding to α. Also, "light-on" induced only weak phase advances of activity-onset, insufficient to compensate for the long endogenous period. The results show that physiological mechanisms necessary for seasonal adaptation are working in DAO hamsters and that it is the inadequate interaction of the LD cycle with the SCN that prevents the photoperiodic reaction. AR hamsters, on the other hand, are incapable of measuring photoperiodic time due to a complete disruption of circadian rhythmicity.