首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

水稻叶片全氮浓度与冠层反射光谱的定量关系
引用本文:周冬琴,田永超,姚霞,朱艳,曹卫星.水稻叶片全氮浓度与冠层反射光谱的定量关系[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(2):337-344.
作者姓名:周冬琴  田永超  姚霞  朱艳  曹卫星
作者单位:南京农业大学江苏省信息农业高技术研究重点实验室,南京,210095
基金项目:国家自然科学基金 , 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划) , 国家科技支撑计划 , 江苏省高技术研究发展计划 , 江苏省农机三项工程资助项目
摘    要:利用数学统计方法分析了不同施氮水平和不同水稻品种群体叶片全氮浓度(LNC)与冠层反射光谱的定量关系,建立了水稻群体叶片全氮浓度的光谱监测模型.结果表明:基于原始反射率构造的光谱参数与叶片全氮浓度的相关程度均高于原始反射率,近红外波段(760~1 220 nm)与可见光波段510、560、680及710 nm组成的比值植被指数、差值植被指数和归一化植被指数与群体叶片全氮浓度呈极显著正相关,其中与归一化植被指数(NDVI)的相关性最好;对拟合较好的6个两波段组合参数及4个特征光谱参数的预测标准误(SE)和决定系数(R2)进行比较后,选取参数NDVI (1220, 710)为反演群体叶片全氮浓度的最佳光谱参数,方程为LNC=3.2708 × NDVI (1220,710) + 0.8654.利用不同粳稻品种、水分和氮肥处理的试验数据对监测模型进行了检验,估计的根均方差(RMSE)均小于20%,预测值和实测值的拟合R2为0.674~0.862,拟合斜率为0.908~1.010,RMSE为11.315%~19.491%,表明模型预测值与实测值之间符合度较高,对不同栽培条件下的水稻群体叶片全氮浓度具有较好的预测性.

关 键 词:水稻  冠层反射光谱  片全氮浓度  监测模型  水稻  叶片全  氮浓度  冠层反射光谱  定量关系  rice  spectra  reflectance  canopy  nitrogen  concentration  total  leaf  relationships  预测性  不同栽培条件  符合度  模型  实测值  预测值  RMSE
文章编号:1001-9332(2008)02-0337-08
收稿时间:2007-01-31
修稿时间:2007-12-20

Quantitative relationships between leaf total nitrogen concentration and canopy reflectance spectra of rice.
ZHOU Dong-qin,TIAN Yong-chao,YAO Xia,ZHU Yan,CAO Wei-xing.Quantitative relationships between leaf total nitrogen concentration and canopy reflectance spectra of rice.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(2):337-344.
Authors:ZHOU Dong-qin  TIAN Yong-chao  YAO Xia  ZHU Yan  CAO Wei-xing
Institution:Hi-Tech Key Laboratory of Information Agriculture of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China. zhoudongdong128@163.com
Abstract:By the method of statistics, this paper approached the quantitative relationships between leaf total nitrogen concentration (LNC) and canopy reflectance spectra of rice, based on the data from 5-year field experiments involving different varieties and nitrogen fertilization rates. The results showed that the LNC had higher correlations with the key spectral parameters of two bands than of single band. The relative, differential, and normalized difference vegetation indices (RVI, DVI, NDVI) of the bands in near infrared (760-1,220 nm) and visible light 510 nm, 560 nm, 680 nm and 710 nm all showed significantly positive correlations to LNC, and NDVI showed the best. All the parameters having significant correlations with LNC were selected to compare the R2 and SE in the regression equations with LNC, which confirmed that the NDVI of R1220 and R710 was the best parameter for predicting the LNC. The quantitative equation LNC = 3.2708 x NDVI (1220, 710) + 0.8654 was tested by the data from other three field experiments with different rice cultivars, water conditions and nitrogen fertilization rates, and the estimated R2, slope, and RMSE were ranged in 0.674-0.862, 0.908-1.010 and 11.315%-19.491%, respectively, indicating a good fit between the predicted and observed values of LNCs, which suggested that this model was feasible for predicting the LNC of rice under different cultivation conditions.
Keywords:rice  canopy reflectance spectra  leaf total nitrogen concentration  monitoring model  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号