Distribution of male yellow dungflies around ovipasition sites: the effect of body size |
| |
Authors: | HREFNA SIGURJÓNSDÓTTIR SIGURðUR S SNORRASON |
| |
Institution: | University College of Education, Stakkahlíd, Reykjavík, Iceland;Institute of Biology, University of Iceland. Reykjavík, Iceland |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract. - 1 Spatial and temporal variation in body size of yellow dungflies, Scatophaga stercoraria, gathering on and around cow droppings was studied in an Icelandic population in order to elucidate the effect of male and female size on male mating tactics.
- 2 Males copulating on droppings were on average larger than males copulating in the grass, but of similar size to males guarding ovipositing females. Males searching on droppings were smaller than males copulating or guarding females on droppings but larger than males copulating in the grass. No such differences were found in female size.
- 3 Resource-holding power of males (RHP, i.e. male: female size ratio) differed between the three mating groups and was highest for males on the droppings. Size and RHP clearly affect the tactics of copulating males. Males with low RHP tend to copulate in the grass in spite of the cost of longer copulation duration. We argue that this is caused by risk of takeovers from large searching males.
- 4 There was no change in male size with the age of individual droppings. Contrary to what might be expected, large searching males are not predominantly found at fresh droppings when the probability of catching unpaired females is highest. We suggest instead that good prospects in taking females over from other males must make the strategy to search for females on older droppings profitable.
- 5 RHP did not change with age of dropping in the three mating groups. The size of ovipositing females increased with age of dropping, probably reflecting longer copulation and egg-laying times of large females.
- 6 We found an overall positive relationship between sizes of male and female partners. This correlation was highly significant for copulating pairs in the grass. This is probably a consequence of males with low RHP copulating in the grass and fights in which larger males take over females from smaller males. A weaker, but significant, correlation was found amongst ovipositing pairs. This must be due to take-over effects. No size correlation was found for pairs copulating on droppings.
|
| |
Keywords: | Scatophaga stercoraria spatial distribution mating tactics searching strategy assortative pairing |
|
|