Trapping initiates stress response in breeding and non-breeding house sparrows Passer domesticus: implications for using unmonitored traps in field studies

In response to a variety of unpredictable conditions, birds secrete the steroid hormone corticosterone, which has numerous effects on physiology and behavior. A standardized protocol of handling and restraint has been demonstrated to elicit a robust corticosterone response in many species of birds. In contrast, comparatively little is known about the effects of capture technique on corticosterone secretion in wild birds. Setting up multiple live traps checked at regular intervals allows field researchers to capture many birds in a short period of time. However, one potential drawback of this technique is that birds may spend unknown lengths of time in traps prior to sampling. Many birds appear to remain calm and/or feed during this period, potentially leading researchers to assume that corticosterone secretion is unaffected by trapping. We assessed the impact of being left in traps for up to 30 minutes on baseline corticosterone and subsequent corticosterone responses to restraint in non‐breeding and breeding house sparrows Passer domesticus. Traps were baited with seed, and birds were either removed immediately after entry (controls), or left in the trap undisturbed for 15 or 30 min. Upon removal, birds were subjected to a standardized handling/restraint protocol in which blood samples were collected within 3 min, and again at regular intervals for 60 min. Analysis of blood samples revealed that both non‐breeding and breeding sparrows that were held in the traps had significantly higher baseline corticosterone than controls, and showed no further increase in corticosterone secretion in response to handling. However, corticosterone responses to trapping differed seasonally. Our study indicates that although birds did not exhibit prolonged escape behavior while trapped, entry into a walk‐in trap initiated a robust stress response. Taken together with data from a previous study, our data suggest that ornithologists should consider species‐specific and stage‐specific effects of trapping on physiology when designing field studies.