首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

涡动相关法与波文比-能量平衡法测算森林蒸散的比较研究--以长白山阔叶红松林为例
引用本文:吴家兵,关德新,张弥,韩士杰,金昌杰.涡动相关法与波文比-能量平衡法测算森林蒸散的比较研究--以长白山阔叶红松林为例[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(10):1245-1249.
作者姓名:吴家兵  关德新  张弥  韩士杰  金昌杰
作者单位:1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳,110016;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100093
2. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳,110016
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(30370293)、中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KZCX1-SW-01-01A)和中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所知识到新工程领域前沿项目.
摘    要:分别采用涡动相关法与波文比-能量平衡法(BREB法)测算了长白山阔叶红松林2002年9、10月的森林蒸散量.结果表明,9月,涡动相关法与BREB法测算的森林蒸散量分别为83.1和87.9 mm,后者相对于前者的误差不到6%,且两者日蒸散量有较好的相关性(0.78),表明涡动相关法与BREB法在森林蒸散研究中有很好的一致性.10月,随着秋季落叶,林内水汽压梯度减小.涡动相关法测算的森林蒸散量为42.5 mm,BREB法测算的结果为49.1 mm,后者相对于前者的误差达到了16%,两者日蒸散量相关系数为0.53.在水汽压梯度较小时,BREB法会产生较大误差.9月中上旬,森林主要热量消耗是用于蒸散,约占辐射平衡量的71%;落叶后,森林主要热量消耗变为森林-大气间的感热交换,蒸散耗热只占辐射平衡量的40%.

关 键 词:蒸散  涡动相关法  波文比
文章编号:1000-4890(2005)10-1245-05
收稿时间:2005-01-21
修稿时间:2005年1月21日

Comparison of Eddy Covariance and BREB methods in determining forest evapotranspiration-Case study on broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain
WU Jiabing,GUAN Dexing,ZHANG Mi,HAN Shijie,JIN Changjie.Comparison of Eddy Covariance and BREB methods in determining forest evapotranspiration-Case study on broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2005,24(10):1245-1249.
Authors:WU Jiabing  GUAN Dexing  ZHANG Mi  HAN Shijie  JIN Changjie
Abstract:In this paper,a comparative study was made to use the methods of Eddy Covariance and Bowen-Ratio Energy Balance(BREB) in continually measuring the evapotranspiration of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain from Sept.1 to Oct.31,2002.The results showed that in September,the evapotranspiration measured by Eddy Covariance and BREB was 83.1 and 87.9 mm,respectively,the error of BREB relative to Eddy Covariance was less than 6%,and the correlation between their daily total evapotranspiration was significant(0.78),suggesting that BREB was in good agreement with Eddy Covariance in forest evapotranspiration measurement.In October,the evapotranspiration measured by Eddy Covariance and BREB was 42.5 and 49.1 mm,respectively,the error of BREB relative to Eddy Covariance was up to 16%,and the correlation coefficient between their daily total evapotranspiration was 0.53,which suggested that the error of BREB method increased with decreasing vapour pressure gradient.In early and mid-September,evapotranspiration consumed 71% of total forest available energy,while most of the available energy was used for the transformation of sensible heat,and only 40% of total available energy was used by evapotranspiration after the forest was leafless.
Keywords:evapotranspiration  Eddy Covariance method  Bowen Ratio  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号