Cell block alone as an ideal preparatory method for hemorrhagic thyroid nodule aspirates procured without onsite cytologists

OBJECTIVE: To study diagnostic efficacy of direct smears (DS) vs. cell block (CB) alone in hemorrhagic thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs) performed without a cytotechnologist or cytopathologist. STUDY DESIGN: Ultrasound-guided thyroid FNAs from an offsite location were retrospectively searched during a 53-month period. Aspirates in the initial 13 months were submitted as air-dried DSs. Subsequent specimens were submitted as CBs. Each case was classified into 1 of 4 categories: (1) nondiagnostic, (2) nonneoplastic, (3) follicular lesions and (4) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). RESULTS: There were 77 aspirates: DS = 20 (26%) and CB = 57 (74%). Two cases had both DSs and CBs. Diagnoses of DS: nondiagnostic = 12 (60%); nonneoplastic = 7 (35%); follicular lesion = 1 (5%). Diagnoses of CB cases: nondiagnostic = 4 (7.0%); nonneoplastic = 43 (75.4%); follicular lesion, including 1 Hürthle cell neoplasm = 7 (12.3%), PTC = 3 (5.3%). Repeat FNAs on 4 nondiagnostic cases (3 DSs, 1 CB) utilizing the CB-only technique were diagnostic and included nodular goiter, follicular neoplasm, PTC, and reactive lymph node. CONCLUSION: Without onsite assessment, CB alone is superior to DSs for hemorrhagic thyroid FNAs. It shows increased diagnostic efficacy and slide reduction and obviates repeat FNAs.