| Abstract: | The binding domains of 28 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the alpha, beta, and delta subunits of the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor were mapped on the primary sequences of these subunits. Small peptide fragments (2000-20,000 daltons) of the purified subunits were obtained by digestion with staphylococcal V8 protease and papain, separated on a discontinuous polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic system, and electroblotted onto diaminophenyl thioether paper. The blots were probed with the various monoclonal antibodies and also with antibodies against carboxy-terminal decapeptides of the alpha, beta, and delta subunits to identify the carboxy-terminal fragments. From inspection of the binding patterns of the various antibodies to the subunits fragments and the molecular weights of these fragments, and by using the carboxy termini of the subunits as reference points, it was possible to deduce the regions on the primary sequence of each subunit in which the antibodies bound and in some cases to order the binding sites within these sequences. mAb 148, which inhibits receptor function by cross-linking receptor molecules on the cytoplasmic side, was mapped to the sequence beta 368-406. The main immunogenic region of the native receptor, which is of pathological importance in the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis, was mapped by using mAb 210 to within 80 amino acid residues (alpha 46-127). The overall antigenic structure of alpha subunits was examined. Synthetic peptides have been used to locate determinants responsible for 83% of the antibodies in antisera to denatured alpha subunits and 46% of the antibodies to denatured alpha subunits in antisera to intact receptor. Theoretical models of the transmembrane orientation of the subunit polypeptide chains were tested by determining whether mapped monoclonal antibodies bound to the extracellular or intracellular surface of receptor-rich membranes. Our results confirm previous reports that the carboxy termini of the subunits are exposed on the intracellular surface, as is part of the region between a putative channel-forming domain (M5) and a putative membrane-spanning region (M3). However, contrary to current theoretical models, the region between M5 and the putative membrane-spanning sequence M4 also appears to be on the intracellular surface, implying that M4 and M5 are not membrane-spanning domains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) |
