Treatment outcome in people with subthreshold compared with full-syndrome binge eating disorder

Objective: There is a controversial discussion in the literature as to whether individuals with subthreshold binge eating disorder (subBED) differ clinically significantly from individuals with full‐syndrome binge eating disorder (BED). This study was designed to compare eating‐related and general psychopathology at baseline and in response to a multimodal treatment program in obese people with subBED compared with BED. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 96 obese participants (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) were assessed for eating‐related and general psychopathology at baseline. Thirty‐nine participants meeting criteria for BED and 19 participants meeting criteria for subBED attended a 15‐session outpatient group therapy including cognitive behavioral therapy extended by interpersonal therapy, nutritional counseling, and a supervised walking exercise. Participants with eating disorders were reassessed at the end of treatment and at 3‐month follow‐up. The obese control group without an eating disorder (n = 38) was assessed once. This was not a randomized controlled trial. Results: Intent‐to‐treat analyses revealed no differences between subBED and full‐syndrome BED participants with regard to eating‐related and general psychopathology at baseline and with regard to treatment outcome. All participants experienced substantial improvements, and the results remained stable during follow‐up (except for dietary restraint). At follow‐up, participants with subBED and BED remained different from non‐eating disorder controls in eating‐related but not general psychopathology. Discussion: The findings indicate that our multimodal treatment program is equally effective in obese subBED and BED participants, suggesting that a differentiation currently seems not to be of clinical significance.