Comparison of multivariate methods for estimating soil total nitrogen with visible/near-infrared spectroscopy

Aims

This study aimed to compare stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) for estimating soil total nitrogen (TN) contents with laboratory visible/near-infrared reflectance (Vis/NIR) of selected coarse and heterogeneous soils. Moreover, the effects of the first (1st) vs. second (2nd) derivative of spectral reflectance and the importance wavelengths were explored.

Methods

The TN contents and the Vis/NIR were measured in the laboratory. Several methods were employed for Vis/NIR data pre-processing. The SMLR, PLSR and SVMR models were calibrated and validated using independent datasets.

Results

Results showed that the SVMR and the PLSR models had similar performances, and better performances than the SMLR. The spectral bands near 1450, 1850, 2250, 2330 and 2430 nm in the PLSR model were important wavelengths. In addition, the 1st derivative was more appropriate than the 2nd derivative for spectral data pre-processing.

Conclusions

PLSR was the most suitable method for estimating TN contents in this study. SVMR may be a promising technique, and its potential needs to be further explored. Moreover, the future studies using outdoor and airborne/satellite hyperspectral data for estimating TN content are necessary for testing the findings.