首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

水稻和小麦根尖细胞壁多糖的铝积累能力比较
引用本文:刘庆,王智怡,吴坤,邢承华,常虹,饶玉春,蔡妙珍.水稻和小麦根尖细胞壁多糖的铝积累能力比较[J].植物科学学报,1983,37(4):513-520.
作者姓名:刘庆  王智怡  吴坤  邢承华  常虹  饶玉春  蔡妙珍
作者单位:1. 浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 浙江金华 321004; 2. 金华职业技术学院, 浙江金华 321004; 3. 浙江师范大学化学与生命科学学院, 浙江金华 321004
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31101599);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY15C150004);浙江省亚热带土壤与植物营养重点研究实验室项目。
摘    要:采用水培法比较4种禾本科植物水稻(Oryza sativa L.)、玉米(Zea mays L.)、高粱(Sorghum bicolor(L.)Moench)和小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)8个基因型的抗铝(Al)能力,并对他们在Al积累后细胞壁的多糖组分进行分析。结果显示,在5~200 μmol/L Al处理下,水稻抗Al能力较强,而小麦抗Al能力较弱。在50 μmol/L Al处理下,小麦根尖的果胶和半纤维素1含量的增幅明显高于水稻。水稻基因型‘日本晴’与‘浙辐802’的细胞壁Al含量分别占根尖总Al含量的78.7%和91.6%;小麦基因型‘扬麦18’与‘扬麦16’Al含量分别占根尖总Al含量的64.9%和72.1%。Al吸附-解吸实验结果显示,小麦根尖细胞壁上Al的吸附量高于水稻。研究结果表明,细胞壁是Al积累的主要部位,对Al敏感的水稻和小麦基因型细胞壁中的Al主要分布在果胶中;而对Al耐性较强的水稻和小麦基因型细胞壁中的Al主要分布在半纤维素1中。

关 键 词:水稻  小麦  铝毒  细胞壁  细胞壁多糖  

Comparison of aluminum accumulation ability of cell wall polysaccharides in Oryza sativa and Triticum aestivum root tips under aluminum toxicity
Liu Qing,Wang Zhi-Yi,Wu Kun,Xing Cheng-Hua,Chang Hong,Rao Yu-Chun,Cai Miao-Zhen.Comparison of aluminum accumulation ability of cell wall polysaccharides in Oryza sativa and Triticum aestivum root tips under aluminum toxicity[J].Plant Science Journal,1983,37(4):513-520.
Authors:Liu Qing  Wang Zhi-Yi  Wu Kun  Xing Cheng-Hua  Chang Hong  Rao Yu-Chun  Cai Miao-Zhen
Institution:1. School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China; 2. Jinhua Polytechnic, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China; 3. School of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China
Abstract:Hydroponics were used to compare eight genotypes of four Poaceae plants (Oryza sativa L., Zea mays L., Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, and Triticum aestivum L.). We investigated their resistance to aluminum (Al) and analyzed the polysaccharide components of the cell wall after Al accumulation. Results revealed that under 5-200 μmol/L Al treatment, rice exhibited the strongest Al resistance, whereas wheat demonstrated the weakest, thus further experiments were carried out on rice and wheat. Under 50 μmol/L Al treatment, the content of pectin and hemicellulose 1 was higher in the wheat root tips than that in the rice root tips. Furthermore, Al content in the cell wall of ‘Nipponbare’ and ‘Zhefu 802’ seedlings accounted for 78.7% and 91.6% of that in the root tips, and in ‘Yangmai 18’ and ‘Yangmai 16’ seedlings accounted for 64.9% and 72.1% of that in the root tips. The Al adsorption-desorption tests further showed that Al uptake in the wheat root tip cell wall was higher than that for rice, whereas the desorption rate was lower than that for rice. The cell wall was the main site for Al accumulation, the pectin component in the cell wall was the major binding site of Al-sensitive rice and wheat genotypes, and the hemicellulose 1 component was the major binding site of Al-tolerant rice and wheat genotypes.
Keywords:Oryza sativa  Triticum aestivum  Aluminum toxicity  Cell wall  Cell wall polysaccharide  
点击此处可从《植物科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号