Respiratory carbon use and carbon storage in mid‐rotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations: the effect of site resources on the stand carbon balance

We used estimates of autotrophic respiration (R_A), net primary productivity (NPP) and soil CO₂ evolution (S_ff), to develop component carbon budgets for 12‐year‐old loblolly pine plantations during the fifth year of a fertilization and irrigation experiment. Annual carbon use in R_A was 7.5, 9.0, 15.0, and 15.1 Mg C ha^?1 in control (C), irrigated (I), fertilized (F) and irrigated and fertilized (IF) treatments, respectively. Foliage, fine root and perennial woody tissue (stem, branch, coarse and taproot) respiration accounted for, respectively, 37%, 24%, and 39% of R_A in C and I treatments and 38%, 12% and 50% of R_A in F and IF treatments. Annual gross primary production (GPP=NPP+R_A) ranged from 13.1 to 26.6 Mg C ha^?1. The I, F, and IF treatments resulted in a 21, 94, and 103% increase in GPP, respectively, compared to the C treatment. Despite large treatment differences in NPP, R_A, and carbon allocation, carbon use efficiency (CUE=NPP/GPP) averaged 0.42 and was unaffected by manipulating site resources. Ecosystem respiration (R_E), the sum of S_ff, and above ground R_A, ranged from 12.8 to 20.2 Mg C ha^?1 yr^?1. S_ff contributed the largest proportion of R_E, but the relative importance of S_ff decreased from 0.63 in C treatments to 0.47 in IF treatments because of increased aboveground R_A. Aboveground woody tissue R_A was 15% of R_E in C and I treatments compared to 25% of R_E in F and IF treatments. Net ecosystem productivity (NEP=GPP‐R_E) was roughly 0 in the C and I treatments and 6.4 Mg C ha^?1 yr^?1 in F and IF treatments, indicating that non‐fertilized treatments were neither a source nor a sink for atmospheric carbon while fertilized treatments were carbon sinks. In these young stands, NEP is tightly linked to NPP; increased ecosystem carbon storage results mainly from an increase in foliage and perennial woody biomass.