Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses

Summary Small, relatively sedentary herbivores like amphipods and polychaetes (mesograzers) often live on the plants they consume and should therefore view plants as both foods and living sites. Large, relatively mobile herbivores like fishes commonly move among, and feed from, many plants; they should view plants primarily as foods and rarely as potential living sites. In marine communities, fishes that consume plants are also important predators on mesograzers. Since seaweeds avoided by fishes should represent safer living sites for small herbivores, mesograzers living on and consuming seaweeds that are not eaten by fishes should have higher fitness than mesograzers living on plants preferred by fishes. In previous work, we demonstrated that seaweed secondary metabolites that deterred feeding by a fish and sea urchin had no effect on feeding by a common amphipod (Hay et al. 1987a). We then hypothesized that mesograzers would, in general, be less affected by seaweed chemical defenses than larger, more mobile herbivores like fishes. In this investigation, we evaluate the generality of this hypothesis by comparing the feeding of an omnivorous fish (Lagodon rhomboides) with that of an omnivorous, tube-building polychaete (Platynereis dumerilii) to see if the mesograzer prefers seaweeds avoided by the fish and if it is less affected by seaweed chemical defense. Platynereis dumerilii fed almost exclusively on Dictyota dichotoma, the seaweed eaten least by Lagodon rhomboides. The diterpene alcohols (dictyol-E and pachydictyol-A) produced by Dictyota significantly deterred feeding by Lagodon but did not affect, or at one concentration stimulated, feeding by Platynereis. Our data support the hypothesis that small, relatively sedentary herbivores that live on plants are more resistant to chemical defenses than are large, relatively mobile herbivores that move among many plants.