Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture

Key message

Mechanical properties of wood constrain most conifers to an excurrent form and limit the width of tree crowns. Development of support tissue alters allometric relations during ontogeny.

Abstract

Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture are explored. Torque on a tree branch is a multiplicative function of mass and moment arm. As such, the need for support rises faster than branch length, which leads to increased taper as branch size increases. This violates assumptions of models, such as the pipe-model theory, for large trees and causes changing allometry with tree size or exposure. Thus, assumptions about optimal design for light capture, self-similarity, or optimal hydraulic architecture need to be modified to account for mechanical constraints and costs. In particular, it is argued that mechanical limitations of compression wood in conifers prevent members of this taxon from developing large branches. With decurrent form ruled out (for larger species), only a conical or excurrent form can develop. Wind is shown to be a major mortality risk for trees. Adaptations for wind include dynamic responses of wood properties and height. It is argued that an adaptation to wind could be the development of an open crown in larger trees to let the wind penetrate, thereby reducing wind-throw risk. It is thus argued that crown shape and branching may result not just from optimal light capture considerations but also from adaptation to and response to wind as well as from mechanical constraints. Results have implications for allometric theory, life history theory, and simulations of tree architecture.