Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the ERSPC and PLCO Trials

The advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the early 1980s revolutionized the diagnosis of prostate cancer. As a result of PSA testing, there has been a surge in the number of prostate cancer diagnoses. This review examines the results of 2 recent landmark trials that studied the effect of screening on prostate cancer mortality: the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the US-based Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.Key words: PSA screening, European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening TrialProstate cancer poses a significant problem for men’s health; it has become the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer death in American men. It is estimated that 1 in 6 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer at some time in their lives, and more than 30,000 men died of the disease in 2002.¹ The advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the early 1980s revolutionized the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and, as a result, there has been a surge in the number of prostate cancer diagnoses.Similar to other common malignancies, such as breast and cervical cancer, population screening with this effective tumor marker appears enticing, and the American health care model has advocated PSA screening since the early 1990s. This review examines the results of 2 recent landmark trials: the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)¹ and the US-based Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.² The results of these trials have contributed significantly to our understanding of the effects and efficacy of prostate cancer screening, and its difficulties. Both trials examined mortality as the endpoint, and both found little effect on mortality from screening.