Shifts in the semidian rhythm of flowering do determine night-break timing and critical night length in Pharbitis nil |
| |
Authors: | O. M. Heide R. W. King L. T. Evans |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Biology and Nature Conservation, Agricultural University of Norway, PO Box 5014, N-1432 ?s, Norway, NO CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, AU
|
| |
Abstract: | There is a semidian (≈12 h) rhythm in the flowering response of the short-day plant Pharbitis nil Choisy following 90 min exposure to either far-red light/darkness or a temperature drop (27 °C to 12 °C) given at various times in constant conditions before an inductive dark period. This semidian rhythmic response to the temperature-drop pretreatments in the light is also evident through the inductive dark period without change of phase. Furthermore, those pretreatments which increase flowering also advance the time of maximum sensitivity to red light (R) interruptions of the dark period by up to 1.5 h and shorten the critical night length. Conversely, pretreatments which reduce flowering delay the time of maximum R inhibition by up to 1.5 h and increase the critical night length by the same amount. However the phase of a circadian rhythm of flowering response had no effect on either the time of maximum R inhibition or the critical night length. Thus, the semidian rhythm determines both the time of maximum R inhibition and the critical night length in Pharbitis. Received: 8 November 1997 / Accepted: 7 January 1998 |
| |
Keywords: | : Flowering Pharbitis (photoperiodism) Photoperiodism Rhythm (semidian) Semidian rhythm Time measurement |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|