Abstract: | Dietz, Niki M., John R. Halliwill, John M. Spielmann, LoriA. Lawler, Bettina G. Papouchado, Tamara J. Eickhoff, and Michael J. Joyner. Sympathetic withdrawal and forearm vasodilation duringvasovagal syncope in humans. J. Appl.Physiol. 82(6): 1785-1793, 1997. Our aim was todetermine whether sympathetic withdrawal alone can account for theprofound forearm vasodilation that occurs during syncope in humans. Wealso determined whether either vasodilating 2-adrenergic receptors ornitric oxide (NO) contributes to this dilation. Forearm blood flow wasmeasured bilaterally in healthy volunteers(n = 10) by using plethysmographyduring two bouts of graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) tosyncope. In one forearm, drugs were infused via a brachial arterycatheter while the other forearm served as a control. In the controlarm, forearm vascular resistance (FVR) increased from 77 ± 7 unitsat baseline to 191 ± 36 units with 40 mmHg of LBNP(P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressurefell from 94 ± 2 to 47 ± 4 mmHg just before syncope, and allsubjects demonstrated sudden bradycardia at the time of syncope. At theonset of syncope, there was sudden vasodilation and FVR fell to 26 ± 6 units (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). When the experimental forearm was treated withbretylium, phentolamine, and propranolol, baseline FVR fell to 26 ± 2 units, the vasoconstriction during LBNP was absent, and FVR fellfurther to 16 ± 1 units at syncope(P < 0.05 vs. baseline). During thesecond trial of LBNP, mean arterial pressure again fell to 47 ± 4 mmHg and bradycardia was again observed. Treatment of the experimentalforearm with the NO synthase inhibitorNG-monomethyl-L-arginine in additionto bretylium, phentolamine, and propranolol significantly increasedbaseline FVR to 65 ± 5 units but did not prevent the marked forearmvasodilation during syncope (FVR = 24 ± 4 vs. 29 ± 8 units inthe control forearm). These data suggest that the profound vasodilationobserved in the human forearm during syncope is not mediated solely bysympathetic withdrawal and also suggest that neither 2-adrenergic-receptor-mediated vasodilation nor NO is essential to observe this response. |