Manipulation of single polymerase-DNA complexes: A mechanical view of DNA unwinding during replication

Comment on: Morin JA, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8115-20.DNA replication requires overcoming the energetic barrier associated with the base pair melting of its double helix and a fine-tuned coordination between the processes of DNA unwinding and DNA replication. One intriguing question that remains poorly understood is the exact mechanism of the coupling of these two reactions. In some organisms, these activities are coupled within the same protein, like in the case of the phage Phi29 DNA polymerase. This polymerase works as a hybrid polymerase-helicase, because it presents an amino acid insertion that together with other protein domains forms a narrow tunnel around the template strand. This topological restriction is similar to the one imposed by hexameric helicases at the fork junction and promotes the separation of the fork ahead.¹ The Phi29 DNA polymerase, therefore, constitutes a simple, good model system to understand the basic mechanistic principles of the coupling between DNA replication and unwinding activities: the polymerase may behave as a “passive” unwinding motor, if translocation of the protein traps transient unwinding fluctuations of the fork, or as an “active” motor, if the polymerase actively destabilizes the duplex DNA at the junction. Therefore, factors that affect the stability of the fork junction, as DNA sequence or mechanical destabilization of the fork, will have a stronger effect on the unwinding kinetics of a “passive” motor than on an “active” one.To determine the DNA unwinding mechanism of the Phi29 DNA polymerase, we used optical tweezers to measure at single molecule level the effect of DNA sequence and destabilizing forces on the fork on the rates of strand displacement (replication and unwinding are tightly coupled, Δx₁, Fig. 1A) and primer extension (replication of the displaced complementary strand without unwinding, Δx₂, Fig. 1A) of two polymerases: the wild-type Phi29 DNA polymerase and a strand displacement deficient variant, which bears a couple of mutations that may affect the stability of the tunnel required for unwinding.² We quantified the free energy of interaction between the polymerase and the DNA fork, ΔG_int, and the range of this interaction, M, through a theoretical analysis of the dependence of the replication, unwinding and pause kinetics on the DNA sequence and force.^3,4Open in a separate windowFigure 1. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design (not to scale). A single DNA hairpin was attached to functionalized beads inside a fluidics chamber. One strand of the hairpin is attached through a dsDNA handle to a bead held in the optical trap (top), while the complementary strand is attached to a bead on top of a mobile micropipette (bottom). At a constant force, after flowing the nucleotides into the reaction chamber, the strand displacement and primer extension rates of the polymerase are detected as a change in distance between the beads, Δx₁ and Δx₂, respectively. (B) Representative replication activity of a single mutant polymerase molecule. Long pauses are observed only during the strand displacement reaction. (C) Mechanistic distinction between passive and active unwinding. The cartoon illustrates the degree of activeness in DNA unwinding of different replicative helicases⁶ and the Phi29 DNA polymerase.Our results show that while the primer extension rates of both polymerases are force- and sequence-independent their average unwinding rates are sensitive to these two variables, although with different intensity. As expected, the dsDNA fork presents a much stronger physical barrier to the mutant polymerase unwinding. Qualitative reasoning might suggest that the observed differences imply different “activeness” of the unwinding mechanism of each polymerase. However, the inclusion of the pause kinetics of each polymerase in our model revealed that they use the same active mechanism; they both destabilize the two nearest base pairs of the fork (M = 2) with an interaction energy ΔG_int = 2 k_BT per base pair. These results suggest that mutations affecting the stability of the tunnel required for unwinding do not decrease the “activeness” of the motor but instead increase the probability of the unwinding mechanism to fail upon encountering a closed fork junction, inducing the entrance of the mutant polymerase into a long-lived inactive pause state (Fig. 1B). These results bring out the importance to consider pause kinetics to accurately quantify the actual unwinding mechanism of the Phi29 DNA polymerase or any other nucleic acid unwinding motor in which pauses are relevant during its operation. The presence of pauses obscures the actual pause-free rates of the motor and can lead to misleading results when they are not properly accounted.Our data are consistent with a model in which the closed template tunnel that wraps around the template strand allows the Phi29 DNA polymerase to maintain a sharp bending of this strand (essential for template reading in all replicative polymerases) and a bending of the complementary strand, due to its steric exclusion, at a closed fork junction. Bending of the two strands would generate mechanical stress at the junction promoting its active destabilization. A less stable tunnel, as in the mutant polymerase, will not be able to keep the mechanical stress at a closed fork junction, in this case the fork pressure would induce loosening of the correct protein-DNA interactions favoring the entrance to a polymerization inactive state.Similar mechanisms for mechanical destabilization of the fork junction can be envisioned for other DNA replication systems in which a DNA polymerase and a helicase work in coordination. In these systems, the leading strand can be sharply bent by the steric exclusion induced by the helicase and by the functional binding of the polymerase generating effective mechanical stress at the fork junction to account for efficient unwinding during replication. These implications are further supported by recent single molecule studies using magnetic tweezers that describe a collaborative coupling of this nature between the activities of the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase and DNA helicase.⁵