Differences between the Surface Properties of the PR and PFR Forms of Native Pea Phytochrome, and Their Application to a Simplified Procedure for Purification of the Phytochrome

The ability of phytochrome from etiolated pea shoots (Pisumsativum L. cv. Alaska) to bind to various chromatographic adsorbentsand its mobility during non-denaturing electrophoresis wereexamined with phytochrome in either the red light-absorbingform (PR) or the far-red light-absorbing form (P_FR). Preferentialbinding of P_FR to modified hydrophilic polyvinyl resins, suchas butyl Toyopearl, phenyl Toyopearl, Blue Toyopearl (CibacronBlue F3G-A conjugated) and Red Toyopearl (Procion Red HE-3Bconjugated), was observed. A simplified method for purificationof native phytochrome was developed based on the propertiesof P_R and P_FR. P_FR bound preferentially to the hydrophobic adsorbents,to indicate that the surface of P_FR is more hydrophobic thanthat of P_R. A difference in net surface charges between P_R andP_FR was detected by an analysis based on the different mobilitiesof the two forms during non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresisin gels prepared with various concentrations of polyacrylamide.The apparent molecular weights of P_R and P_FR, estimated fromthe analysis, were 378 and 419 kilodaltons, respectively. Thedifference suggests that a significant change in molecular shapeoccurs during the photoconversion. The differences in surfaceproperties of P_R and P_FR are discussed. (Received April 20, 1991; Accepted August 26, 1991)