Tissue analyses guidelines for diagnosing sulfur deficiency in white wheat

Summary Visual identification of S deficiency in white wheat is difficult since deficiency symptoms are nearly identical with those of N deficiency. In this study, S deficiency was best identified by determining the total N/S ratio rather than S concentration in vegetative tissue. Vegetative growth generally decreased from tillering to boot when the whole plant N/S ratio exceeded 17. The N/S ratio in S-sufficient plants declined gradually with age, implying that the critical N/S ratio may decline with advancing growth. Changes in stem: leaf ratio could have been responsible for the decline since the N/S ratio in stem tissue at heading was less than that of green leaf tissue.Sulphur concentration less reliably indicated S-deficiency, because differences in S levels between S-deficient and S-sufficient wheat, were often less than year-to-year variation of S concentration of plants sampled at the same growth stage. In addition, S concentration in whole plants declined sharply between tillering and heading. These factors make it difficult to designate a critical S level. Sulfur distribution among various plant organs suggests that critical S levels might best be obtained by utilizing green leaf tissue.Nitrogen concentration in S-sufficient wheat plants also decreased quite rapidly with growth, which indicates a similar difficulty for determining critical N percentages. Consequently, the most reliable distinction between N and S deficiency in wheat was accomplished by evaluation of the total N/S ratio in whole plant tissue.Contribution from the Agricultural Research Service, USDA, in cooperation with the Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University. Technical Paper No.3953 of the latter.