首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam Principles)
Authors:Kinsinger Christopher R  Apffel James  Baker Mark  Bian Xiaopeng  Borchers Christoph H  Bradshaw Ralph  Brusniak Mi-Youn  Chan Daniel W  Deutsch Eric W  Domon Bruno  Gorman Jeff  Grimm Rudolf  Hancock William  Hermjakob Henning  Horn David  Hunter Christie  Kolar Patrik  Kraus Hans-Joachim  Langen Hanno  Linding Rune  Moritz Robert L  Omenn Gilbert S  Orlando Ron  Pandey Akhilesh  Ping Peipei  Rahbar Amir  Rivers Robert  Seymour Sean L  Simpson Richard J  Slotta Douglas  Smith Richard D  Stein Stephen E  Tabb David L  Tagle Danilo  Yates John R  Rodriguez Henry
Institution:Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. kinsingc@mail.nih.gov
Abstract:Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the United States National Cancer Institute convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: 1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and 2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号