Future directions in the ontogeny of plant defence: understanding the evolutionary causes and consequences |
| |
Authors: | Kasey E. Barton Karina Boege |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Botany, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822, USA;2. Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. A.P. 20‐275. Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad De México, México |
| |
Abstract: | Plant defence often varies by orders of magnitude as plants develop from the seedling to juvenile to mature and senescent stages. Ontogenetic trajectories can involve switches among defence traits, leading to complex shifting phenotypes across plant lifetimes. While considerable research has characterised ontogenetic trajectories for now hundreds of plant species, we still lack a clear understanding of the molecular, ecological and evolutionary factors driving these patterns. In this study, we identify several non‐mutually exclusive factors that may have led to the evolution of ontogenetic trajectories in plant defence, including developmental constraints, resource allocation costs, multi‐functionality of defence traits, and herbivore selection pressure. Evidence from recent physiological studies is highlighted to shed light on the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation and activation of these developmental changes. Overall, our goal is to promote new research avenues that would provide evidence for the factors that have promoted the evolution of this complex lifetime phenotype. Future research focusing on the questions and approaches identified here will advance the field and shed light on why defence traits shift so dramatically across plant ontogeny, a widespread but poorly understood ecological pattern. |
| |
Keywords: | Growth‐defence trade‐offs ontogeny optimal defence theory phase change phenotypic plasticity plant defence syndromes plant– herbivore interactions |
|
|