Chloroplast DNA variations in sect. Cyclachaena of Iva (Asteraceae) |
| |
Authors: | Bomao Miao Billie L. Turner Tom J. Mabry |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Plant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc., P. O. Box 2180, Ardmore, Oklahoma, 73402;2. Department of Botany, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78713 |
| |
Abstract: | Much argument has been occasioned by questions having to do with generic concepts in the tribe Heliantheae, subtribe Ambrosiinae, especially involving the genus Iva. Some workers recognize five genera (e.g., Leuciva, Chorisiva, Oxytenia, Cyclachaena, and Iva s. str.), while others recognize only a single genus Iva s. 1. Although chemical, pollen ultrastructure, and other morphological data have challenged the latter concept, relationships among the segregate taxa are still unclear. The current study used cladistic analyses of chloroplast DNA variation to investigate evolutionary relationships within Iva s. l., especially within the controversial section Cyclachaena. Nuclear rDNA was also utilized to test for hybrid origin of selected taxa. The results support the dismemberment of Iva s. l. and recognition of Iva s. str., largely because Iva s. l. is shown to be paraphyletic. Most members of the section Cyclachaena were found to have relatively close interspecific relationships. Nevertheless, cpDNA data strongly support two lineages within Cyclachaena. One lineage, including I. xanthifolia, I. acerosa, I. nevadensis, and I. dealbata, has a close relationship with the genus Euphrosyne. The second lineage includes only one species, I. ambrosiaefolia, which is closely related to Dicoria. The origin of I. ambrosiaefolia was shown to be monophyletic, not involving hybridization. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|