Alanine Scanning of the S6 Segment Reveals a Unique and cAMP-sensitive Association between the Pore and Voltage-dependent Opening in HCN Channels

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-modulated (HCN) channels resemble Shaker K⁺ channels in structure and function. In both, changes in membrane voltage produce directionally similar movement of positively charged residues in the voltage sensor to alter the pore structure at the intracellular side and gate ion flow. However, HCNs open when hyperpolarized, whereas Shaker opens when depolarized. Thus, electromechanical coupling between the voltage sensor and gate is opposite. A key determinant of this coupling is the intrinsic stability of the pore. In Shaker, an alanine/valine scan of residues across the pore, by single point mutation, showed that most mutations made the channel easier to open and steepened the response of the channel to changes in voltage. Because most mutations likely destabilize protein packing, the Shaker pore is most stable when closed, and the voltage sensor works to open it. In HCN channels, the pore energetics and vector of work by the voltage sensor are unknown. Accordingly, we performed a 22-residue alanine/valine scan of the distal pore of the HCN2 isoform and show that the effects of mutations on channel opening and on the steepness of the response of the channel to voltage are mixed and smaller than those in Shaker. These data imply that the stabilities of the open and closed pore are similar, the voltage sensor must apply force to close the pore, and the interactions between the pore and voltage sensor are weak. Moreover, cAMP binding to the channel heightens the effects of the mutations, indicating stronger interactions between the pore and voltage sensor, and tips the energetic balance toward a more stable open state.Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-modulated (HCN)4 channels are similar in structure and function to Shaker K⁺ channels (1–3). As in Shaker, HCN channels are comprised of four subunits, which each consist of six predicted membrane-spanning segments (S1–S6). The S1–S4 segments form the voltage-sensing domain, and the S5 and S6 segments, the pore-forming domain. The S4 segment in both channels contains positive charges that move similarly in response to changes in membrane voltage (4–6), to then alter the pore structure at the intracellular side of the S6 segment; this region functions as a voltage-controlled gate to cation flow (7–10). Despite these similarities, HCN channels are opened by hyperpolarization of the membrane potential, whereas Shaker channels open in response to depolarization. Thus, the electromechanical coupling between the voltage sensor and the gate is reversed in these two channels.A key determinant of this coupling is the intrinsic stability of the closed and open conformations of the pore. In Shaker channels, it has been proposed that the pore is intrinsically most stable when closed and that the voltage sensor works to open the pore during depolarization (11, 12). Results from an alanine/valine scan of residues across the entire Shaker pore, by single point mutation, showed that most mutations made the channel easier to open and steepened the response of the channel to changes in voltage. It was argued that, because most mutations likely destabilize protein packing, the closed conformation must be the stable state; this is consistent with the observed crystal structures of Shaker-related channels KcsA and MthK, in the closed and open states, respectively, wherein more optimally and tightly packed helices were seen in the closed conformation (13–15).Because of presumed shared architecture of the gate between HCN and Shaker channels, HCN channels might also be most stable when closed, and thus the voltage sensor would work to open the pore upon hyperpolarization. To test this hypothesis, we performed an alanine/valine scan of the C-terminal 22 amino acids of the S6 segment in HCN2, used as a prototype, and examined pore energetics as described previously in Shaker (11). Choice of this region for mutation was based on: 1) in Shaker, the corresponding region harbors one of two clusters of gating-sensitive residues and 2) it contains the voltage-controlled gate. Surprisingly, the effects of the mutations on channel opening and on the steepness of the channel''s response to voltage are mixed and smaller than those in Shaker. These findings imply that, in HCN2, the stabilities of the open and closed pore are similar, the interactions between the pore and voltage sensor, both structural and functional, are weaker than in Shaker, and that the voltage sensor must apply force to the pore to close it. Thus, Shaker is closed and HCN2 is open in the absence of input from the voltage sensor. Moreover, cAMP binding to the HCN2 channel heightens the effects of the mutations, indicating stronger interactions between the pore and voltage sensor, and tips the energetic balance toward a more stable open state.