首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Molecular Determinants of the Interaction between Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin Fragments and Claudin-3
Authors:Lars Winkler  Claudia Gehring  Ariane Wenzel  Sebastian L Müller  Christian Piehl  Gerd Krause  Ingolf E Blasig  J?rg Piontek
Institution:From the Leibniz Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Rössle-Strasse, 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany
Abstract:Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) binds to the extracellular loop 2 of a subset of claudins, e.g. claudin-3. Here, the molecular mechanism of the CPE-claudin interaction was analyzed. Using peptide arrays, recombinant CPE-(116–319) bound to loop 2 peptides of mouse claudin-3, -6, -7, -9, and -14 but not of 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10–13, 15, 16, 18–20, and 22. Substitution peptide mapping identified the central motif 148NPL150VP, supposed to represent a turn region in the loop 2, as essential for the interaction between CPE and murine claudin-3 peptides. CPE-binding assays with claudin-3 mutant-transfected HEK293 cells or lysates thereof demonstrated the involvement of Asn148 and Leu150 of full-length claudin-3 in the binding. CPE-(116–319) and CPE-(194–319) bound to HEK293 cells expressing claudin-3, whereas CPE-(116–319) bound to claudin-5-expressing HEK293 cells, also. This binding was inhibited by substitutions T151A and Q156E in claudin-5. In contrast, removal of the aromatic side chains in the loop 2 of claudin-3 and -5, involved in trans-interaction between claudins, increased the amount of CPE-(116–319) bound. These findings and molecular modeling indicate different molecular mechanisms of claudin-claudin trans-interaction and claudin-CPE interaction. Confocal microscopy showed that CPE-(116–319) and CPE-(194–319) bind to claudin-3 at the plasma membrane, outside cell-cell contacts. Together, these findings demonstrate that CPE binds to the hydrophobic turn and flanking polar residues in the loop 2 of claudin-3 outside tight junctions. The data can be used for the specific design of CPE-based modulators of tight junctions, to improve drug delivery, and as chemotherapeutics for tumors overexpressing claudins.The clinical use of many promising drug candidates is impeded by unacceptable pharmacokinetics (1). The ability of a drug to pass through tissue barriers is a major determinant for its delivery. In epithelia and endothelia, the paracellular route is blocked by tight junctions (TJ).4 Different approaches have been used to enhance transcellular drug delivery. These include the use of influx transporters, blocking of efflux transporters, or receptor-mediated endocytosis (2). Alternative approaches aim to enhance paracellular permeation of drugs by loosening the TJ (3, 4). This strategy has the advantage that it could improve the delivery of structurally unrelated drugs, and the drug itself does not have to be modified. Although different TJ modulators have been described, most of these are based on surfactants or chelators (3). These often have low tissue specificity and cause severe side effects, e.g. exfoliation of cells, which irreversibly compromise the barrier functions (5, 6). Fewer side effects may be obtained by more specific modulation of a molecular key component of the TJ (7).TJ consist of transmembrane proteins, mainly the tetraspan proteins of the claudin family, as well as occludin and tricellulin (8). Other molecules associated with TJ include membrane-bound scaffolding and signaling proteins (9). However, claudins (Cld) are the major functional constituent of TJ (10). Claudins tighten the paracellular space, selectively for tissue, size, and charge. The tissue-specific combination of the claudin subtypes present in heteropolymers is assumed to determine the permeability properties of TJ (11). It was therefore proposed that tissue-specific drug delivery via the paracellular route would be possible by modulation of the barrier-function of claudins in a subtype-specific manner (7).A subset of claudins, e.g. Cld3 and -4 but not -1 and -2, have been shown to be receptors for Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) with high association constants of about 108 m?1 (12). CPE causes one of the most common food-borne diseases (13). It consists of two functional domains, an N-terminal region that mediates the cytotoxic effect and the C-terminal region (CPE-(184–319)), which binds to extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) of Cld3 but not of Cld1 nor to the ECL1 of Cld3 (12). Treatment of epithelial monolayers with non-cytotoxic CPE-(184–319) increases paracellular permeability (14). CPE-(184–319) enhanced drug absorption in rat jejunum 400-fold relative to sodium caprate, which is in clinical use (15). Thus, CPE is a promising tool to specifically modulate claudins, the key constituents of TJ, and thereby to enhance paracellular drug delivery. In addition, some studies have suggested the use of CPE for the chemotherapy of tumors overexpressing claudins (1618).Cld1 and -5 are potential targets for transepidermal and brain drug delivery, respectively (19, 20). However, it has been reported that these claudins do not interact with CPE (12). Modification of CPE could enhance and/or shift its claudin-subtype specificity. Therefore, the design of CPE-based TJ modulators could permit efficient claudin subtype-specific modulation, which would also be tissue-specific modulation of TJ. To achieve this, an understanding of the molecular mechanism of the CPE-claudin interaction is a necessary prerequisite. In this study, we identify the residues within the ECL2 of Cld3 that are involved in interaction with CPE.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号