首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Comparison of CT artifacts and image recognition of various fiducial markers including two types of thinner fiducial markers for CyberKnife treatment
Institution:1. Kasugai CyberKnife Rehabilitation Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan;2. Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan;3. Shizuoka City Shimizu Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan;4. Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Abstract:AimThe aim of the study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) artifacts and image recognition of the CyberKnife system. Regarding fiducial markers, VISICOIL of 0.5 mm × 5.0 mm and 0.75 mm × 5.0 mm, ball-shaped Gold Anchor (GA) of 0.28 mm × 10 mm and 0.28 mm × 20 mm, were compared with the standard cylinder marker of 0.9 mm × 3.0 mm (ACCULOC).BackgroundRecently, various kinds of commercial fiducial markers have been available in CyberKnife treatment.Materials and methodsThe CT images of a water equivalent gel with each fiducial marker were acquired for the evaluation of CT artifacts. The evaluation was performed using the standard deviation of Hounsfield Unit (HU) value for a rectangle region near the fiducial marker. Then, to evaluate the image recognition, each fiducial marker was located to overlap in the target locating system (TLS) for the two sites; the vertebral bone and the pubic bone.ResultsFor CT artifacts, the standard deviations of the VISICOIL of 0.5 mm × 5.0 mm was the smallest. The image recognition of four fiducial markers had a value close to the standard cylinder marker and was feasible for common use, but was slightly poorer when using GA of 0.28 mm × 10 mm in the dynamic conditions.ConclusionOur results indicated that VISICOIL 0.5 × 5.0 mm and the GAs can be used nearly always for CyberKnife treatment in spite of their much thinner needles than those of cylinder types.
Keywords:Fiducial marker  CyberKnife  VISICOIL  Gold Anchor  SBRT  CT artifact
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号