Sample preconditioning for measurement of fluorescence induction of chlorophyll a in marine phytoplankton

Conditions for measuring fluorescence induction curves (time-scalems) of in vivo chlorophyll ^a were studied using cultures ofDunaliella tertiolecta Butcher (Chlorophyceae) and of Thalassiosirapseudonana Hustedt (3H) (Bacillariophyceae), and samples ofnatural phytoplankton populations from the Grand Banks. Thearea above the fluorescence induction curve (A_DCMU) and themaximum fluorescence intensity (F_max) measured in the presenceof 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea (DCMU) were computedby microcomputer. Cells must be ‘conditioned’ or‘adapted’ prior to obtaining a fluorescence inductioncurve; dark-adaptation resulted in a lower A_DCMU and F_max thandid adaptation in far-red (720 nm) light, and was the conditioningmethod chosen. A_DCMU and F_max increased linearly with increasingirradiance up to 32.8 W m^–2 the highest actinic irradianceavailable. Information on the light history of D. tertiolectawas obtained by following the time-course of change in A_DCMUand in F_max for cells exposed for 10 min to far-red or to bluelight. The rise-time of the fluorescence induction curve andvalues of F_max were greater for samples of D. tertiolecta concentratedonto glass-fiber filters than for liquid samples, however, valuesof A_DCMU for filtered and liquid samples were not significantlydifferent. Samples of Grand Banks phytoplankton collected ontoglass-fiber filters and frozen for 28 d exhibited a significantdecrease in F_max and in A_DCMU relative to the same freshly-filteredsamples. Filtration and freezing of samples is not recommended. ^*This paper is the result of a study made at the Group for AquaticPrimary Productivity (GAP). Second International Workshop heldat the National Oceanographic Institute. Haifa. Israel in April–May1984.