Prediction of protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence

The conformational parametersP _k for each amino acid species (j=1–20) of sequential peptides in proteins are presented as the product ofP _i,k , wherei is the number of the sequential residues in thekth conformational state (k=-helix,-sheet,-turn, or unordered structure). Since the average parameter for ann-residue segment is related to the average probability of finding the segment in the kth state, it becomes a geometric mean of (P _k )_av=(P _i,k ) ^1/n with amino acid residuei increasing from 1 ton. We then used ln(P_k)_av to convert a multiplicative process to a summation, i.e., ln(P _k ) _av =(1/n)P _i,k (i=1 ton) for ease of operation. However, this is unlike the popular Chou-Fasman algorithm, which has the flaw of using the arithmetic mean for relative probabilities. The Chou-Fasman algorithm happens to be close to our calculations in many cases mainly because the difference between theirP _k and our InP _k is nearly constant for about one-half of the 20 amino acids. When stronger conformation formers and breakers exist, the difference become larger and the prediction at the N- and C-terminal-helix or-sheet could differ. If the average conformational parameters of the overlapping segments of any two states are too close for a unique solution, our calculations could lead to a different prediction.