An evaluation of self‐reported mobile phone use compared to billing records among a group of engineers and scientists

Most epidemiologic studies of potential health impacts of mobile phones rely on self‐reported information, which can lead to exposure misclassification. We compared self‐reported questionnaire data among 60 participants, and phone billing records over a 3‐year period (2002–2004). Phone usage information was compared by the calculation of the mean and median number of calls and duration of use, as well as correlation coefficients and associated P‐values. Average call duration from self‐reports was slightly lower than billing records (2.1 min vs. 2.8 min, P = 0.01). Participants reported a higher number of average daily calls than billing records (7.9 vs. 4.1, P = 0.002). Correlation coefficients for average minutes per day of mobile phone use and average number of calls per day were relatively high (R = 0.71 and 0.69, respectively, P < 0.001). Information reported at the monthly level tended to be more accurate than estimates of weekly or daily use. Our findings of modest correlations between self‐reported mobile phone usage and billing records and substantial variability in recall are consistent with previous studies. However, the direction of over‐ and under‐reporting was not consistent with previous research. We did not observe increased variability over longer periods of recall or a pattern of lower accuracy among older age groups compared with younger groups. Study limitations included a relatively small sample size, low participation rates, and potential limited generalizability. The variability within studies and non‐uniformity across studies indicates that estimation of the frequency and duration of phone use by questionnaires should be supplemented with subscriber records whenever practical. Bioelectromagnetics 32:37–48, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.