Water loss from cut grass with special reference to hay-making

Water loss from cut grass was studied to determine factors limiting the drying process. An apparatus, used to measure water loss at 28±1°C from blotting paper and from leaves and stem internodes of cocksfoot, consisted of four channels in which air speed was controlled at 25–80 cm s^-1 and relative humidity at 7–68%. The maximum rate of water loss from wet blotting paper was 10500 mg water dm^-2 h^-1 but from leaves and stem internodes supplied with water it was less than 250 mg dm^-2 h^-1. The rate of loss from both plant specimens and blotting paper was linearly related to the vapour pressure differences between the specimen and the surrounding air but was not increased when air speed was changed from 40 to 80 cm s^-1. Grass specimens supplied with water had lower rates of water loss than wet blotting paper because of tissue resistances which were calculated for (a) untreated leaf and stem specimens, (b) rubbed leaves, (c) cut leaves, (d) leaves exposed to steam for 60 s. Treatments (b)-(d) greatly reduced tissue resistances. The rates of drying of leaves and stem internodes not supplied with water changed only slightly in response to faster air speeds but were significantly increased by treatments (b), (c), (c_s) (split stems), (d) and (e) (exposure to petroleum vapour for 60 s). The most effective treatments trebled the drying rates of leaves and increased the drying rates of stem internodes by 10 times. Reductions in relative humidity had little effect on drying rate following treatments (a), (b), (c) and (d), but when treatments (c_s) and (e) were given, additional significant increases in drying rates were obtained when the relative humidity was reduced. Grass specimens given the most effective treatments and dried under the most favourable conditions did not utilize the full drying capacity of the environment, for the rates of water loss from these specimens were at least three times lower than those from wet blotting paper. The results indicate that high rates of drying could be achieved at 28 ^oC or similar temperatures if practical treatments were developed to remove or greatly reduce the high resistance to water loss in cut grass.