Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA

Denitrification is an important net sink for NO₃ ^? in streams, but direct measurements are limited and in situ controlling factors are not well known. We measured denitrification at multiple scales over a range of flow conditions and NO₃ ^? concentrations in streams draining agricultural land in the upper Mississippi River basin. Comparisons of reach-scale measurements (in-stream mass transport and tracer tests) with local-scale in situ measurements (pore-water profiles, benthic chambers) and laboratory data (sediment core microcosms) gave evidence for heterogeneity in factors affecting benthic denitrification both temporally (e.g., seasonal variation in NO₃ ^? concentrations and loads, flood-related disruption and re-growth of benthic communities and organic deposits) and spatially (e.g., local stream morphology and sediment characteristics). When expressed as vertical denitrification flux per unit area of streambed (U _denit, in μmol N m^?2 h^?1), results of different methods for a given set of conditions commonly were in agreement within a factor of 2–3. At approximately constant temperature (~20 ± 4°C) and with minimal benthic disturbance, our aggregated data indicated an overall positive relation between U _denit (~0–4,000 μmol N m^?2 h^?1) and stream NO₃ ^? concentration (~20–1,100 μmol L^?1) representing seasonal variation from spring high flow (high NO₃ ^?) to late summer low flow (low NO₃ ^?). The temporal dependence of U _denit on NO₃ ^? was less than first-order and could be described about equally well with power-law or saturation equations (e.g., for the unweighted dataset, U _denit ≈26 * [NO₃ ^?]^0.44 or U _denit ≈640 * [NO₃ ^?]/[180 + NO₃ ^?]; for a partially weighted dataset, U _denit ≈14 * [NO₃ ^?]^0.54 or U _denit ≈700 * [NO₃ ^?]/[320 + NO₃ ^?]). Similar parameters were derived from a recent spatial comparison of stream denitrification extending to lower NO₃ ^? concentrations (LINX2), and from the combined dataset from both studies over 3 orders of magnitude in NO₃ ^? concentration. Hypothetical models based on our results illustrate: (1) U _denit was inversely related to denitrification rate constant (k1_denit, in day^?1) and vertical transfer velocity (v _f,denit, in m day^?1) at seasonal and possibly event time scales; (2) although k1_denit was relatively large at low flow (low NO₃ ^?), its impact on annual loads was relatively small because higher concentrations and loads at high flow were not fully compensated by increases in U _denit; and (3) although NO₃ ^? assimilation and denitrification were linked through production of organic reactants, rates of NO₃ ^? loss by these processes may have been partially decoupled by changes in flow and sediment transport. Whereas k1_denit and v _f,denit are linked implicitly with stream depth, NO₃ ^? concentration, and(or) NO₃ ^? load, estimates of U _denit may be related more directly to field factors (including NO₃ ^? concentration) affecting denitrification rates in benthic sediments. Regional regressions and simulations of benthic denitrification in stream networks might be improved by including a non-linear relation between U _denit and stream NO₃ ^? concentration and accounting for temporal variation.