The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies

1. The relative extent of generalist or specialist resource use strategies is an important question in ecology. A community dominated by specialist strategies suggests a high level of interspecific competition for resources, resulting in the evolutionary development of isolating mechanisms between species (e.g. resource specialization to avoid and/or outcompete other species). A community dominated by generalist strategies suggests less interspecific competition for resources, allowing many taxa to utilize the same resources. In stream systems, generalist food habits are a common strategy among primary consumers, but little is known about resource assimilation strategies (resources incorporated into tissue growth). Published data indicate that generalist resource assimilation strategies may prevail in lotic systems as well.
2. Functional feeding groups (FFGs) are often used to infer resource assimilation among lotic macroinvertebrates (e.g. shredder-detritivore, scraper-herbivore). While these groupings are aptly used to describe invertebrate feeding modes and community structure, the use of FFGs to describe resource assimilation among lotic consumers is not appropriate. Sufficient data now exist to seriously question how accurately FFG assignments describe the processes of energy flow and material transfer between trophic levels in stream ecosystems.
3. Because FFGs may not accurately describe functional attributes in lotic systems, an alternative approach is needed. One approach is to determine the amount of secondary production that is derived from autochthonous (e.g. periphyton and algae) and allochthonous (e.g. detritus) resources directly. A simple model of community function based on this approach is presented. The model incorporates trophic generalists into measurement of consumer–resource energetics in lotic systems.