Fine-scale substrate use by a small sit-and-wait predator

Substrate choice is one of the most important decisions thatsit-and-wait predators must make. Not only may it dictate theprey available but also the cover for the predator which mayconceal it from prey or its own predators. However, while ona particular substrate the behavior and use of that substratemay vary widely. When naïve, newly emerged crab spiderlingsMisumena vatia (Thomisidae) occupied flowering goldenrod Solidagocanadensis, their behavior differed markedly on inflorescenceswith relatively sparse and densely packed flower heads as wellas on experimentally thinned and unthinned inflorescences. Initially,the spiderlings most often hunted at the thinned sites and hidamong the dense flower heads at the unthinned sites, a differencethat disappeared in all broods tested after 2–3 h, possiblybecause of the growing hunger of the initially concealed individuals.Prey capture (dance flies) in the thinned sites initially significantlyexceeded that in unthinned sites but subsequently did not differ.However, spiderlings encountered their principal predator, thejumping spider Pelegrina insignis, significantly more oftenon unthinned than thinned inflorescences. Even though usagepatterns initially differed strikingly, spiderlings did notdiffer in their rates of quitting the two types of sites. Theseresults suggest a trade-off between foraging and predator avoidancethat changes in response to increasing hunger over time.