首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重症监护室患者压力性损伤的危险因素及Braden评分和经皮氧分压的预测价值分析
引用本文:高 娟,罗嫚丽,梁美景,唐海霞,刘晶晶,佘 会,徐 庆. 重症监护室患者压力性损伤的危险因素及Braden评分和经皮氧分压的预测价值分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 0(16): 3163-3167
作者姓名:高 娟  罗嫚丽  梁美景  唐海霞  刘晶晶  佘 会  徐 庆
作者单位:安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000;江苏省人民医院麻醉手术科 江苏 南京 210000
基金项目:安徽省重点研究和开发计划项目(1804h08020297)
摘    要:摘要 目的:分析重症监护室(ICU)患者压力性损伤(PI)的危险因素并探讨Braden评分和经皮氧分压(TcPO2)对其的预测价值。方法:选取2019年12月~2021年12月我院ICU 45例发生PI患者为PI组,另选取ICU 45例未发生PI患者为非PI组,收集患者基线资料、Braden评分及TcPO2。比较两组患者基线资料和Braden评分、TcPO2,采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析ICU患者发生PI的危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析Braden评分与TcPO2对ICU患者PI发生风险的预测价值。结果:PI组年龄大于非PI组,机械通气比例和体温高于非PI组,住院时间长于非PI组,血清白蛋白、Braden评分、TcPO2低于非PI组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄增长(OR=1.100,95%CI:1.003~1.206)、体温上升(OR=1.217,95%CI:1.014~1.460)、住院时间延长(OR=1.240,95%CI:1.049~1.467)、Braden评分下降(OR=1.950,95%CI:1.312~2.898)、TcPO2下降(OR=1.128,95%CI:1.053~1.209)为ICU患者发生PI的危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,Braden评分和TcPO2单独与联合预测ICU患者PI发生风险的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.785、0.794、0.898,Braden评分联合TcPO2预测ICU患者PI发生风险的AUC大于二者单独预测。结论:年龄增长、体温上升、住院时间延长、Braden评分下降、TcPO2下降是ICU患者发生PI的危险因素,Braden评分、TcPO2对ICU患者PI发生风险具有一定的预测价值,二者联合效能更佳。

关 键 词:重症监护室;压力性损伤;危险因素;Braden评分;经皮氧分压;预测价值
收稿时间:2022-03-06
修稿时间:2022-03-28

Risk Factors for Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Unit Patients and the Predictive Value Analysis of Braden Score and Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure
Abstract:ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the risk factors for pressure injury (PI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to explore the predictive value of Braden score and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2). Methods: From December 2019 to December 2021, 45 patients with PI in ICU of our hospital were selected as PI group, and 45 patients without PI in ICU were selected as non PI group. Baseline data, Braden score and TcPO2 of patients were collected. The baseline data, Braden score and TcPO2 of the two groups were compared. The risk factors of PI in ICU patients were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of Braden score and TcPO2 on the risk of PI in ICU patients. Results: The age of PI group was older than that of non PI group, the proportion of mechanical ventilation and body temperature were higher than those of non PI group, the length of hospital stay was longer than that of non PI group, and the serum albumin, Braden score and TcPO2 were lower than those of non PI group (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (OR=1.100, 95% CI: 1.003~1.206), rising body temperature(OR=1.217, 95% CI: 1.014~1.460), prolonged hospital stay (OR=1.240, 95% CI: 1.049~1.467), decreased Braden score (OR=1.950, 95% CI: 1.312~2.898) and decreased TcPO2(OR=1.128, 95% CI: 1.053~1.209) were the risk factors for PI in ICU patients (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC) of Braden score and TcPO2 alone and in combination were 0.785, 0.794 and 0.898, respectively, and the AUC of Braden score and TcPO2 alone in predicting the risk of PI in ICU patients was greater than that of the two alone. Conclusion: Increasing age, rising body temperature, prolonging hospital stay, decreasing Braden score and decreasing TcPO2 are the risk factors of PI in ICU patients. Braden score and TcPO2 have certain predictive value for the risk of PI in ICU patients, and the combination efficiency of the two is better.
Keywords:Intensive care unit   Pressure injury   Risk factors   Braden score   Transcutaneous oxygen pressure   Predictive value
点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号