| Institution: | 1. Section of Endocrine Surgery, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California;3. Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California;4. Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California;5. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California;6. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California |
| Abstract: | BackgroundExternal beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is rarely used to treat patients with differentiated or medullary thyroid cancer. Although EBRT is generally administered to patients with high-risk or unresectable diseases, neither its indications for the use nor the associated outcomes are well-defined. We used a statewide cohort to assess the trends in EBRT use and postradiation outcomes in California.MethodsA population-based study of patients within the California Cancer Registry who underwent EBRT after surgery for nonanaplastic thyroid cancer (2003-2017) was conducted. The primary outcome was the annual utilization rate of EBRT. The secondary outcomes included Kaplan-Meier analysis for cause-specific survival and identifying factors associated with improved survival after EBRT.ResultsAmong the 57 607 patients with nonanaplastic thyroid cancer from 2003 to 2017, 344 (0.6%) patients received EBRT. EBRT was utilized in 0.4% of papillary, 1.1% of follicular, and 7.7% of medullary thyroid cancers in California. Overall, 99 (28.8%) patients treated with EBRT died of thyroid cancer. The 10-year cause-specific survival of all patients with thyroid cancer after EBRT was 61.5% (95% CI: 54.8%-69.1%) and that of patients without distant disease was 80.3% (95% CI: 73.5%-87.8%). The survival outcomes varied by tumor size, histology, disease stage, patient age at diagnosis, and the presence of extrathyroidal extension (P < .05).ConclusionsThe use of adjuvant EBRT for nonanaplastic thyroid cancer remained stable and low in California from 2003 to 2017. The comparative efficacy of EBRT was not discernible in this study, but disease control appeared durable in select patients. Well-controlled observational studies and/or prospective studies are needed to better define which patients benefit from EBRT. |
