Effects of intertrial reinforcers on rats' timing behavior |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Integrative and Evolutionary Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;2. Animal Biology Department, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar;3. Madagascar Biodiversity Partnership; Conservation Genetics Department, Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium, Omaha, NE, USA;4. Herpetology Section, Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Los Angeles, CA, USA;5. Tropical Biodiversity and Environmental Doctoral Department, University of Toliara, Toliara, Madagascar;6. Department of Biology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, USA;1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;2. Electron Microscopy Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;3. Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;4. Department Industrial & Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of non-contingent intertrial interval (ITI) reinforcers on rats' discrimination of duration. In the first experiment, rats' discrimination of a 2 vs. 8 s of light was significantly disrupted when reinforcers were presented in the ITI. Disruption was not different on short (2 s) and long (8 s) trials. The second experiment showed that this disruptive effect was not specific to trials preceded by ITI reinforcers; responding on empty ITI trials run in the same session as ITI-reinforcer trials was also disrupted. This disruption however was not as great as on the ITI-reinforcer trials. The results of these experiments show that ITI reinforcers affect timing discriminations in much the same way they affect classical conditioning and delayed matching to sample. However, detailed examination of the results suggests that the deleterious effects of ITI reinforcers in these different paradigms might be produced by different rather than the same mechanism. The results also support the conclusion that pre-trial reinforcement “priming” produces disruption rather than facilitation in complex tasks. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
