DNA-binding site of lac repressor probed by dimethylsulfate methylation of lac operator.

In order to compare the structures of the DNA-binding sites on variants of the lac repressor, we have studied the influence of these variants on the dimethylsulfate methylation of the lac operator. Since a bound protein changes the availability of specific purines in the operator to this chemical attack, comparisons of the methylation patterns will show similarities or differences in the protein DNA contacts. We compared lac repressor, induced lac repressor (repressor bound to the gratuitous inducer isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside), mutant repressors having increased operator affinities (X86, I12 and the X86-I12 double mutant) and repressor peptides (long headpiece, residues 1 to 59 and short headpiece. residues 1 to 51). All of these repressors and repressor peptides exhibit the same general pattern of protection and enhancement in the operator; however, the short headpiece pattern differs most from that of the repressor while the induced repressor and the long headpiece show intermediate patterns that are strikingly similar to each other. The mutant repressors do not show an isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside effect but otherwise are almost indistinguishable from wild-type repressor. These results demonstrate that all molecules bind to the operator using basically the same protein-DNA contacts; they imply that (1) most and possibly all repressor contacts to operator lie within amino acids 1 to 51, (2) inducer weakens many contacts rather than totally disrupting one or even a few and (3) the tight-binding mutants do not make additional contacts to the DNA.These results are consistent with a model in which the amino-terminal portions of two repressor monomers make the DNA contacts. We show that one can understand the affinity of binding as related to the accuracy of the register of the two amino-terminal portions along the DNA. Furthermore, the action of inducer and the behaviour of the tight binding mutants can be accomodated within a two-state model in which the strongly or weakly binding states correspond to structures in which the amino-terminal regions are rigidly or loosely held with respect to each other.