Improving Software Performance for Peptide Electron Transfer Dissociation Data Analysis by Implementation of Charge State- and Sequence-Dependent Scoring

The use of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation for analysis of peptides eluting in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry experiments is increasingly common and can allow identification of many peptides and proteins in complex mixtures. Peptide identification is performed through the use of search engines that attempt to match spectra to peptides from proteins in a database. However, software for the analysis of ETD fragmentation data is currently less developed than equivalent algorithms for the analysis of the more ubiquitous collision-induced dissociation fragmentation spectra. In this study, a new scoring system was developed for analysis of peptide ETD fragmentation data that varies the ion type weighting depending on the precursor ion charge state and peptide sequence. This new scoring regime was applied to the analysis of data from previously published results where four search engines (Mascot, Open Mass Spectrometry Search Algorithm (OMSSA), Spectrum Mill, and X!Tandem) were compared (Kandasamy, K., Pandey, A., and Molina, H. (2009) Evaluation of several MS/MS search algorithms for analysis of spectra derived from electron transfer dissociation experiments. Anal. Chem. 81, 7170–7180). Protein Prospector identified 80% more spectra at a 1% false discovery rate than the most successful alternative searching engine in this previous publication. These results suggest that other search engines would benefit from the application of similar rules.The recently developed fragmentation approach of electron transfer dissociation (ETD)¹ has become a genuine alternative to the more ubiquitous collision-induced dissociation (CID) for high throughput and high sensitivity proteomic analysis (1–3). ETD (4) and the related fragmentation process electron capture dissociation (ECD) (5) have been demonstrated to have particular advantages for the analysis of large peptides and small proteins (6–8) as well as the analysis of peptides bearing labile post-translational modifications (9–11). The results achieved through ETD and ECD analysis have been shown to be highly complementary to those obtained through CID fragmentation analysis, both through increasing confidence in particular identifications of peptides and also by allowing identification of extra components in complex mixtures (10, 12, 13). As CID and ETD can be sequentially or alternatively performed on precursor ions in the same mass spectrometric run, it is expected that the combined use of these two fragmentation analysis techniques will become increasingly common to enable more comprehensive sample analysis.Software for analysis of CID spectra is significantly more advanced than that for ECD/ETD data. This is partly because the behavior of peptides under CID fragmentation is better characterized and understood so software has been developed that is better able to predict the fragment ions expected. The fragment ion types observed in ETD and ECD are largely known (5, 14, 15), but information about the frequency and peak intensities of the different ion types observed is less well documented.We recently performed a study to characterize how frequently the different fragment ion types are detected in ETD spectra when analyzing complex digest mixtures produced by proteolytic enzymes or chemical cleavage reagents of different sequence specificity (16). These results were analyzed with respect to precursor charge state and location of basic residues, which were both shown to be significant factors in controlling the fragment ion types observed. The results showed that ETD spectra of doubly charged precursor ions produced very different fragment ions depending on the location of a basic residue in the sequence.Based on this statistical analysis of ETD data from a diverse range of peptides (16), in the present study, a new scoring system was developed and implemented in the search engine Batch-Tag within Protein Prospector that adjusts the weighting for different fragment ion types based on the precursor charge state and the presence of basic amino acid residues at either peptide terminus. The results using this new scoring system were compared with the previous generation of Batch-Tag, which used ion score weightings based on the average frequency of observation of different fragment types in ETD spectra of tryptic peptides and used the same scoring irrespective of precursor charge and sequence. The performance of this new scoring was also compared with those reported by other search engines using results previously published from a large standard data set (17). The new scoring system allowed identification of significantly more spectra than achieved with the previous scoring system. It also assigned 80% more spectra than the most successful of the compared search engines when using the same false discovery rate threshold.