Adverse outcomes among Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis

Background

The Aboriginal population in Canada experiences high rates of end-stage renal disease and need for dialytic therapies. Our objective was to examine rates of mortality, technique failure and peritonitis among adult aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis in the province of Manitoba. We also aimed to explore whether differences in these rates may be accounted for by location of residence (i.e., urban versus rural).

Methods

We included all adult patients residing in the province of Manitoba who received peritoneal dialysis during the period from 1997–2007 (n = 727). We extracted data from a local administrative database and from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry and the Peritonitis Organism Exit-sites/Tunnel infections (POET) database. We used Cox and logistic regression models to determine the relationship between outcomes and Aboriginal ethnicity. We performed Kaplan–Meier analyses to examine the relationship between outcomes and urban (i.e., 50 km or less from the primary dialysis centre in Winnipeg) versus rural (i.e., more than 50 km from the centre) residency among patients who were aboriginal.

Results

One hundred sixty-one Aboriginal and 566 non-Aboriginal patients were included in the analyses. Adjusted hazard ratios for mortality (HR 1.476, CI 1.073–2.030) and adjusted time to peritonitis (HR 1.785, CI 1.352–2.357) were significantly higher among Aboriginal patients than among non-Aboriginal patients. We found no significant differences in mortality, technique failure or peritonitis between urban- or rural-residing Aboriginal patients.

Interpretation

Compared with non-Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis had higher mortality and faster time to peritonitis independent of comorbidities and demographic characteristics. This effect was not influenced by place of residence, whether rural or urban.The Canadian Aboriginal population suffers from a high burden of illness,^1,2 low socio-economic status and geographic isolation.³ A high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, obesity and hypertension in this population is resulting in rapid growth in rates of kidney disease and renal failure (i.e., end-stage renal disease).^4–6 The escalation in demand for dialytic services and care of patients with end-stage renal disease care will require appropriate planning and allocation of health care resources.Hemodialysis is resource-intensive and requires residence in proximity to a dialysis centre. In Canada, roughly 18% of all dialysis patients are receiving peritoneal dialysis.⁷ These patients are responsible for their own dialysis therapy and are seen periodically in an ambulatory clinic setting. No clear mortality-related benefit is associated with choice in modality of dialysis; each method has its own risks and benefits.^8–10 Complications of peritoneal dialysis include technique failure, which often requires conversion to hemodialysis and relocation of the patient, and peritonitis.Dosage of peritoneal dialysis is determined by the combined clearance of solutes from the peritoneum (termed the peritoneal Kt/V) and, if applicable, by residual renal function (termed renal Kt/V). The peritoneal equilibration test is a marker of the peritoneal membranes solute transport characteristics and high peritoneal equilibration test values have been associated with inflammation, volume overload, technique failure and mortality.¹¹Compared with non-Aboriginal patients who have end-stage renal disease, Aboriginal patients with end-stage renal disease are younger on average and more likely to reside in geographically remote locations.¹² Use of home-based dialysis modalities, such as peritoneal dialysis, would be well suited to this population because it allows patients to continue to live in their communities. However, residing far from a dialysis centre or a patient’s primary nephrologist is associated with increased mortality, poor compliance and impaired quality of life.^12,13 Previous studies have found that Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis have similar mortality and rates of technique failure to patients of other ethnicities. But whether this is true in a contemporary cohort is not known.^14,15Our objective was to examine differences in mortality and in rates of technique failure and peritonitis among Aboriginal patients versus non-Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and to explore whether differences may be accounted for by urban versus rural residence.